<h1 style="text-align: center;">The Double Standard Of Promiscuity Explained</h1>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1209272415/photo/one-woman-with-two-men-threesome-or-love-triangle-popular-powerful-boss-lady-open.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=Vy-7yt_mLPO-KL1htosF6aAduRHFQ_YP4QTVSeFUPhM=" alt="" width="800" /></p>
<p>File this one under too obvious for an article to be written about it, but hey, it seems these days that common sense and the obvious are elusive concepts to the bulk of people out there as they try to come to terms with why things are the way they are. The biggest feminist cry to come out over the past decade or so is this why should we shame promiscuous women, and their misguided demand that if a woman is promiscuous for sleeping with a lot of men, then a man should be equally shamed. They despise this double standard because it undermines their argument that the sexes are the same. This is an ideal that when put under any scrutiny it falls apart, and thus unravels the whole gender equality claims – that there are differences and anyone that’s actually been active in the sexual market place can see, if they take off the blinders that political correctness and feminism has put on.</p>
<p>The reason promiscuous women should be shamed, as opposed to players being as they traditionally have been, praised, is because of the ease and difficulties in getting intimate with the desired class of the opposing sex. As a man we know how easy it is for women to get intimate, all they have to do is say yes, and if they offered it up, they’d have a line up down the street of men wanting to give it to them, reverse it and you would find a dry desert even for the most desirable of men. We’ve discussed this before and the same argument always comes back from women is that it’s not that easy to get intimate with men as I and others claim. This seems like a major disconnect.</p>
<h2>Understanding The Pools In The Sexual Marketplace</h2>
<p>The most important thing to understand is the disparity in dating and intimacy pools between men and women. Women have a much smaller pool of men they consider acceptable. They are often selective for status, appearance, and resources. Meanwhile, men typically desire a broader range of partners. This creates a natural imbalance in supply and demand in the sexual marketplace. This dynamic explains why promiscuity can be judged differently for men and women. For insights on <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Luxembourg-dating-service.html?page=21">modern dating</a> dynamics and app culture, see <a href="https://blog.loveawake.com/2022/05/16/dating-apps-reframing-how-and-why-you-use-them/" rel="dofollow">dating apps: reframing how and why you use them</a>.</p>
<h2>The Female Perspective And Dating Expectations</h2>
<p>Women’s smaller dating pool means their expectations are higher and their options more limited. This fuels a perception of entitlement to high-quality partners and explains the selectivity in dating choices. Male promiscuity within their much <a href="https://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Luxembourg-dating-service.html">larger dating poo</a>l often doesn’t raise the same social critique, though it merits respect among men for their broader success. For further understanding on social attraction and partner selection, see <a href="https://blog.loveawake.com/2019/07/09/do-women-persecute-good-guys/" rel="dofollow">do women persecute good guys?</a>.</p>
<h2>The Roots Of The Double Standard</h2>
<p>This is why the double standard exists. A man who can be successful with women, has done something significant as equal to a girl being successful with the top 1% of men she desires. Men face much larger competition with a smaller pool of willing women to choose from, getting sex from multiple girls from that pool is something to be proud of, a girl getting action from a large pool of willing men is not something to be proud of.</p>
<div id="gtx-trans" style="position: absolute; left: 663px; top: 958.398px;"> </div>